|
apnic-089-v002.txt |
|
apnic-089-v003.txt |
|
|
|
——————————————————————- |
|
——————————————————————- |
|
|
APNIC Document identity |
|
APNIC Document identity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
Title: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short title: ipv6-address-policy |
|
Short title: ipv6-address-policy |
|
|
Document ref: APNIC-089 |
|
Document ref: APNIC-089 |
|
|
|
Version: 002 |
|
Version: 003 |
|
|
Date of original publication: 1 July 2002 |
|
Date of original publication: 1 July 2002 |
|
|
|
Date of this version: 16 August 2004 |
|
Date of this version: 26 May 2005 |
|
|
Review scheduled: n/a |
|
Review scheduled: n/a |
|
|
Obsoletes: n/a |
|
Obsoletes: n/a |
|
|
Status: Obsolete |
|
Status: Obsolete |
|
|
Comments: n/a |
|
Comments: n/a |
|
|
——————————————————————– |
|
——————————————————————– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status of this Memo |
|
Status of this Memo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document was developed through joint discussions among the |
|
This document was initially developed through joint discussions |
|
|
APNIC, ARIN and RIPE communities. |
|
among the APNIC, ARIN and RIPE communities. The document also |
|
|
|
|
incorporates APNIC-specific policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document defines registry policies for the assignment and |
|
This document defines registry policies for the assignment and |
|
|
allocation of globally-unique IPv6 addresses to ISPs and other |
|
allocation of globally-unique IPv6 addresses to ISPs and other |
|
|
organizations. This document obsoletes the “Provisional IPv6 |
|
organizations. This document obsoletes the “Provisional IPv6 |
|
|
assignment and allocation policy document”. |
|
assignment and allocation policy document”. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document was developed jointly by the communities of APNIC, |
|
This document was developed jointly by the communities of APNIC, |
|
|
ARIN, and RIPE. |
|
ARIN, and RIPE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents |
|
Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status of this Memo |
|
Status of this Memo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction |
|
1. Introduction |
|
|
|
1.1. Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1. Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Definitions |
|
2. Definitions |
|
|
|
2.1. Internet Registry (IR) |
|
|
|
|
2.2. Regional Internet Registry (RIR) |
|
2.1. Internet Registry (IR) |
|
|
2.3. National Internet Registry (NIR) |
|
2.2. Regional Internet Registry (RIR) |
|
|
2.4. Local Internet Registry (LIR) |
|
2.3. National Internet Registry (NIR) |
|
|
2.5. Allocate |
|
2.4. Local Internet Registry (LIR) |
|
|
2.6. Assign |
|
2.5. Allocate |
|
|
2.7. Utilization |
|
2.6. Assign |
|
|
2.8. HD-Ratio |
|
2.7. Utilization |
|
|
2.9. End site |
|
2.8. HD-Ratio |
|
|
|
|
2.9. End site |
|
|
|
|
2.10. Internet Exchange Point (IXP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Goals of IPv6 address space management |
|
3. Goals of IPv6 address space management |
|
|
|
3.1. Goals |
|
|
|
|
3.2. Uniqueness |
|
3.1. Goals |
|
|
3.3. Registration |
|
3.2. Uniqueness |
|
|
3.4. Aggregation |
|
3.3. Registration |
|
|
3.5. Conservation |
|
3.4. Aggregation |
|
|
3.6. Fairness |
|
3.5. Conservation |
|
|
3.7. Minimized Overhead |
|
3.6. Fairness |
|
|
3.8. Conflict of goals |
|
3.7. Minimized Overhead |
|
|
|
|
3.8. Conflict of goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. IPv6 Policy Principles |
|
4. IPv6 Policy Principles |
|
|
|
4.1. Address space not to be considered property |
|
|
|
|
4.2. Routability not guaranteed |
|
4.1. Address space not to be considered property |
|
|
4.3. Minimum Allocation |
|
4.2. Routability not guaranteed |
|
|
4.4. Consideration of IPv4 infrastructure |
|
4.3. Minimum Allocation |
|
|
|
|
4.4. Consideration of IPv4 infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Policies for allocations and assignments |
|
5. Policies for allocations and assignments |
|
|
|
5.1. Initial allocation |
|
|
|
|
5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria |
|
5.1. Initial allocation |
|
|
5.1.2. Minimum initial allocation size |
|
|
|
|
5.1.3. Larger initial allocations |
|
5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria |
|
|
5.2. Subsequent allocation |
|
5.1.2. Minimum initial allocation size |
|
|
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria |
|
5.1.3. Larger initial allocations |
|
|
5.2.2. Applied HD-Ratio |
|
|
|
|
5.2.3. Subsequent Allocation Size |
|
5.2. Subsequent allocation |
|
|
5.3. LIR-to-ISP allocation |
|
|
|
|
5.4. Assignment |
|
5.2.1. Subsequent allocation criteria |
|
|
5.4.1. Assignment address space size |
|
5.2.2. Applied HD-Ratio |
|
|
5.4.2. Assignment of multiple /48s to a single end site |
|
5.2.3. Subsequent Allocation Size |
|
|
5.4.3. Assignment to operator’s infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
5.5. Registration |
|
5.3. LIR-to-ISP allocation |
|
|
5.6. Reverse lookup |
|
|
|
|
5.7. Existing IPv6 address space holders |
|
5.4. Assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4.1. Assignment address space size |
|
|
|
|
5.4.2. Assignment of multiple /48s to a single end site |
|
|
|
|
5.4.3. Assignment to operator’s infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5. Registration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6. Reverse lookup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7. Existing IPv6 address space holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8. Assignments to IXPs and critical infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8.1. Internet Exchange Points |
|
|
|
|
5.8.2. Critical infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. References |
|
6. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Appendix A: HD-Ratio |
|
7. Appendix A: HD-Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Appendix B: Background information |
|
8. Appendix B: Background information |
|
|
|
8.1. Background |
|
|
|
|
8.2. Why a joint policy |
|
8.1. Background |
|
|
8.3. The size of IPv6’s address space |
|
8.2. Why a joint policy |
|
|
8.4. Acknowledgment |
|
8.3. The size of IPv6’s address space |
|
|
|
|
8.4. Acknowledgment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction |
|
1. Introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1. Overview |
|
1.1. Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document describes policies for the allocation and assignment of |
|
This document describes policies for the allocation and assignment of |
|
|
globally-unique Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) address space. It |
|
globally-unique Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) address space. It |
|
|
updates and obsoletes the existing Provisional IPv6 Policies in |
|
updates and obsoletes the existing Provisional IPv6 Policies in |
|
|
effect since 1999 [RIRv6-Policies]. Policies described in this |
|
effect since 1999 [RIRv6-Policies]. Policies described in this |
|
|
document are intended to be adopted by each registry. However, |
|
document are intended to be adopted by each registry. However, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 243 |
|
skipping to change at line 265 |
|
|
An end site is defined as an end user (subscriber) who has a business |
|
An end site is defined as an end user (subscriber) who has a business |
|
|
relationship with a service provider that involves: |
|
relationship with a service provider that involves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– that service provider assigning address space to the end user |
|
– that service provider assigning address space to the end user |
|
|
– that service provider providing transit service for the end user |
|
– that service provider providing transit service for the end user |
|
|
to other sites |
|
to other sites |
|
|
– that service provider carrying the end user’s traffic. |
|
– that service provider carrying the end user’s traffic. |
|
|
– that service provider advertising an aggregate prefix route that |
|
– that service provider advertising an aggregate prefix route that |
|
|
contains the end user’s assignment |
|
contains the end user’s assignment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.10. Internet Exchange Point (IXP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An Internet Exchange Point (IX or IXP) is a layer 1 and layer 2 network |
|
|
|
|
structure that interconnects three or more Autonomous Systems (AS) for |
|
|
|
|
the purpose of Internet traffic interchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Goals of IPv6 address space management |
|
3. Goals of IPv6 address space management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1. Goals |
|
3.1. Goals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPv6 address space is a public resource that must be managed in a |
|
IPv6 address space is a public resource that must be managed in a |
|
|
prudent manner with regards to the long-term interests of the |
|
prudent manner with regards to the long-term interests of the |
|
|
internet. Responsible address space management involves balancing a |
|
internet. Responsible address space management involves balancing a |
|
|
set of sometimes competing goals. The following are the goals |
|
set of sometimes competing goals. The following are the goals |
|
|
relevant to IPv6 address policy. |
|
relevant to IPv6 address policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skipping to change at line 559 |
|
skipping to change at line 587 |
|
|
Organizations that received /35 IPv6 allocations under the previous |
|
Organizations that received /35 IPv6 allocations under the previous |
|
|
IPv6 address policy [RIRv6-Policies] are immediately entitled to have |
|
IPv6 address policy [RIRv6-Policies] are immediately entitled to have |
|
|
their allocation expanded to a /32 address block, without providing |
|
their allocation expanded to a /32 address block, without providing |
|
|
justification, so long as they satisfy the criteria in Section 5.1.1. |
|
justification, so long as they satisfy the criteria in Section 5.1.1. |
|
|
The /32 address block will contain the already allocated smaller |
|
The /32 address block will contain the already allocated smaller |
|
|
address block (one or multiple /35 address blocks in many cases) that |
|
address block (one or multiple /35 address blocks in many cases) that |
|
|
was already reserved by the RIR for a subsequent allocation to the |
|
was already reserved by the RIR for a subsequent allocation to the |
|
|
organization. Requests for additional space beyond the minimum /32 |
|
organization. Requests for additional space beyond the minimum /32 |
|
|
size will be evaluated as discussed elsewhere in the document. |
|
size will be evaluated as discussed elsewhere in the document. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8. Assignments to IXPs and critical infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8.1 Internet Exchange Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet Exchange Points are eligible to receive a portable assignment |
|
|
|
|
from APNIC to be used exclusively to connect the IXP participant devices |
|
|
|
|
to the Exchange Point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /48. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global routability of the portable assignment is left to the discretion |
|
|
|
|
of the IXP and its participants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8.2 Critical infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following critical infrastructure networks, if operating in the Asia |
|
|
|
|
Pacific region, are eligible to receive a portable assignment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– root domain name system (DNS) server; |
|
|
|
|
– global top level domain (gTLD) nameservers; |
|
|
|
|
– country code TLD (ccTLDs) nameservers; |
|
|
|
|
– IANA; |
|
|
|
|
– Regional Internet Registry (RIRs); and |
|
|
|
|
– National Internet Registry (NIRs). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignments to critical infrastructure are available only to the actual |
|
|
|
|
operators of the network infrastructure performing such functions. Registrar |
|
|
|
|
organisations which do not actually host the network housing the registry |
|
|
|
|
infrastructure, will not be eligible for an assignment under this policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum assignment made under these terms is /32. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchanges made under this policy remain subject to the address space license |
|
|
|
|
policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. References |
|
6. References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC1715] “The H Ratio for Address Assignment Efficiency”, C. |
|
[RFC1715] “The H Ratio for Address Assignment Efficiency”, C. |
|
|
Huitema. November 1994, RFC 1715. |
|
Huitema. November 1994, RFC 1715. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[IAB-Request] “Email from IAB to IANA“, |
|
[IAB-Request] “Email from IAB to IANA“, |
|
|
http://www.iab.org/iab/DOCUMENTS/IPv6addressspace.txt. |
|
http://www.iab.org/iab/DOCUMENTS/IPv6addressspace.txt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[RFC2373] “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture”, R. Hinden, S. |
|
[RFC2373] “IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture”, R. Hinden, S. |
|
|
Deering. July 1998, RFC 2373. |
|
Deering. July 1998, RFC 2373. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of changes. 12 change blocks. |
|
47 lines changed or deleted |
|
110 lines changed or added |
|
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |